Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia

Conferenza / Incontro
Image
Logo FeBo

The Koinon’s Last Resort:

Foreign Judges and Intra-Federal Border Management in the Achaian League

16 Giugno 2026 , ore 18:00
Aula 001
Ingresso libero, Online su prenotazione
Organizzato da: Elena Franchi e Claudio Biagetti
Destinatari: Tutti/e
Contatti: 
Staff del Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia
Image
Logo FeBo

Questo contenuto è disponibile solo in inglese.

Speaker: Dimitrios Sparis (UC Berkeley)

The recently-published dossier recording the dispute between Messene and Megalopolis over Akreiatis and Bipeiatis (SEG 58.370, ca. 182-175 BCE) offers an unparalleled window into the Achaian koinon's management of its internal borders. The contested territory generated a crisis that moved through no fewer than four distinct institutional responses, exposing the instruments through which the koinon governed the boundaries between its member-states: an extraordinary tribunal of seventeen federal hagemones conducting a formal periegesis of disputed land, a large court convened at an ekkletos member-polis, and crucially – at the moment when Messene directly challenged the validity of a federal fine – the unilateral invitation of six Milesian judges empowered to pass a binding verdict.
This paper argues that the Milesian intervention reveals the deeper logic of the koinon’s border-management hierarchy: where member-state intransigence threatened federal authority itself, the koinon abandoned its preference for disputant agency and reached for an instrument – the xenikon dikasterion – conventionally associated with the single polis managing its most dangerous domestic crises. That this instrument appears at the apex of the League’s creative arbitrative toolkit, this paper further argues, reframes the relationship between federalism and internal border management in the Achaian world. The koinon’s goal was the frictionless coexistence of its member-states – not as an end in itself, but as the precondition for a harmonious federal balance of power free of internal violence, in which its own sovereignty remained unimpeachable. When that sovereignty was directly challenged, coexistence gave way to executive unilateralism, and the xenikon dikasterion became the instrument through which the koinon reasserted its authority over the federal whole. To buttress this argument, the paper draws on a corpus of ca. 40 attested Peloponnesian arbitrations and a selection of ca. 170 foreign judge inscriptions, spanning from 300 to 146 BCE.