Abstract
For more than 50 years now, ecologists have collected census data for several ecosystems around the world from diverse communities such as tropical forests, coral reefs, plankton, etc. However, despite the contrasting biological and environmental conditions in these ecological communities, some macroecological patterns can be detected that reflect strikingly similar characteristics in very different communities. This suggests that there are ecological mechanisms that are insensitive to the details of the systems and that are responsible of the emergence of general patterns.
These are the right pre-requisites for a playing field where statistical physicists can play and score goals! A classical and standard approach is the one proposed by Lotka1 and Volterra2, where the dynamics of interacting ecological species is described by asymmetrical interactions between predator-prey or resource- consumers systems. The Lotka and Volterra equations have provided much theoretical guidance. For instance, MacArthur3 developed a model for studying interactions among consumers which exploit common resources. However, none of these models are able to explain the empirically and universal observed patterns.
We will present the neutral (stochastic) model of biodiversity4, 5 and the metabolic theory of biodiversity for forests6, 7 and how they are able to predict the observed emergent patterns.
Forests cover about 30% of the land surface and they contribute 50% of the terrestrial net primary productivity thus playing a critical role in the dynamics of earth-climate systems.
We demonstrate an astounding simplicity underlying the apparent bewildering complexity of forests.
1. Lotka, A. J. (1910). "Contribution to the Theory of Periodic Reaction". J. Phys. Chem. 14 (3): 271–274
2. Volterra, V. (1926). "Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi". Mem. Acad. Lincei Roma. 2: 31–113.
3. MacArthur, R. H. (1970). "Species packing and competitive equilibria for many species", Theor. Pop. Biol. 1: I-II.
4. Hubbell, Stephen P. "The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography (MPB-32)." The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (MPB-32). Princeton University Press, 2011.
5. Azaele, S., Suweis, S., Grilli, J., Volkov, I., Banavar, J. R., & Maritan, A. (2016). Statistical mechanics of ecological systems: Neutral theory and beyond. Reviews of Modern Physics, 88(3), 035003.
6. Simini, F., Anfodillo, T., Carrer, M., Banavar, J. R., & Maritan, A. (2010). Self-similarity and scaling in forest communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(17), 7658-7662.
7. Volkov, I., Tovo, A., Anfodillo, T., Rinaldo, A., Maritan, A., & Banavar, J. R. (2022). Seeing the forest for the trees through metabolic scaling. PNAS Nexus, 1(1), pgac008
Link utili
https://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035003
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1000137107
https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/1/1/pgac008/6546200